Model selection UI lets users choose which model or tier runs a task—balancing speed, quality, cost, and tools—via a picker in the composer or settings. Clear labels beat raw model codenames so people can match the model to the job.
Perfect for AI platforms, developer tools, and applications where letting users choose models improves performance, cost efficiency, and user satisfaction.
| Product | Implementation |
|---|---|
| ChatGPT | Model and mode choices with outcome-oriented labels in menus. |
| Claude | Model and effort on the composer for spend and quality before send. |
| Perplexity | Model picker on the bar; free tiers show locks on premium models. |
| Gemini | Flash nickname on the bar; picker uses plain-language thinking copy. |
Copy this prompt to generate a production-ready implementation in Cursor, Claude Code, Lovable, or any AI coding agent.
Generate a production-ready implementation of the "Model Selection UI" AI interface design pattern.
Pattern Definition:How shipped products implement model selection ui, from our teardown guides.

Design the composer

Design the composer

Design the composer

Design the composer

Design the composer

Output, artifacts & refinement
A model selection UI is the control that lets users pick which AI model or tier handles their request, usually exposing tradeoffs between speed, quality, cost, and available tools.
Prefer outcome labels (“Faster”, “More reasoning”, “Deep research”) for mainstream users. Show model names for power users and developers who already have a mental model of the lineup.
Put it on the composer when cost and latency matter before send. Settings-only pickers are fine for defaults, but hide too much when users need per-task control.
Show locks or upgrade affordances honestly on gated models. Silent fallback to a weaker model after the user picked a stronger one breaks trust.
API quota display
Expected wait times
Show operation costs
API limit alerts
Show when cached results are used
Queue multiple requests for efficiency